Platforms like DRIPify offer deeper insight into your LinkedIn engagement journey — showing stats like:

• Connection request sent / accepted

• Invite withdrawn

• Liked/commented on a post

• Followed vs connected

In Sourcewhale, there’s currently no visibility on these micro-engagements. This makes it hard to track:

• Whether someone is a first, second, or third-degree connection

• Whether they’ve been followed but not connected

• If a connection request was sent, accepted, or withdrawn

• What light-touch engagement (e.g. post like) has already occurred

Why this matters:

• These steps shape campaign sequencing.

For example:

• You might follow someone first, then engage with a post, before sending a connection request.

• You don’t want to resend a connection request or message if one is already pending.

• It helps you avoid duplicate or awkward touches and better personalise follow-ups.

Suggested Improvements:

• Display connection degree + follow status in the contact pop-up and project list.

• Show LinkedIn action history (e.g. followed on June 10, connection request sent June 12).

• Add filters or icons to help sort contacts by engagement status.

This would bring Sourcewhale closer to what tools like DRIPify provide — but within a project-based, search-led workflow that better suits executive search.